目的探讨研究12导联动态心电图与64层螺旋CT在冠心病诊断中的应用价值。方法选取2012年1月至2015年8月我院收治的可疑冠心病患者90例为研究对象,患者均进行冠脉造影检查及12导联动态心电图、64层螺旋CT检查,以冠脉造影检查结果为金标准,对比三种方法诊断冠心病的临床价值。结果12导联动态心电图诊断冠心病的灵敏度为76.92%,特异度为78.95%,准确度为77.78%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为83.33%和71.43%;单支病变检出率为56.52%,多支病变检出率为93.10%,多支病变检出率显著高于单支病变的检出率(P<0.01)。64层螺旋CT诊断冠心病的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为86.54%、31.58%、63.33%、63.38%和63.16%。两种方法联合检测诊断冠心病的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94.23%、84.21%、90.00%、89.09%和91.43%。联合检查诊断冠心病的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值均明显高于单纯12导联动态心电图或64层螺旋CT检查,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论12导联动态心电图和64层螺旋CT在冠心病的诊断中均有一定的应用价值,将两种方法联合使用,能大幅提高诊断的灵敏度和特异度,有效降低误诊率和漏诊率。
ObjectiveTo discuss and study the application value of 12 leads ambulatory electrocardiogram and 64 slice spiral CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. MethodsA total of 90 patients with suspected coronary heart disease admitted to our hospital from January 2012 to August 2015 were selected, all patients were performed coronary angiography, 12 lead dynamic electrocardiogram, 64 slice spiral CT, respectively.The results of coronary angiography was taken as golden criterion, the value of 12 leads ambulatory electrocardiogram, 64 slice spiral CT, and the combined examination of the two methods in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease were compared and analyzed. ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 12 lead dynamic electrocardiogram in diagnosing coronary artery disease were 76.92%, 78.95%, 77.78%, 83.33% and 71.43%,respectively, and the single vessel disease detection rate of 12 lead dynamic electrocardiogram (56.52%) was significantly lower than the multiple lesions detection rate (93.10%, P<0.05), the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 64 slice spiral CT were 86.54%,31.58%、63.33%、63.38% and 63.16%, respectively, the combined examination of the two methods were 94.23%,84.21%、90.00%、89.09% and 91.43%, respectively.The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the combined examination of the two methods were significantly higher than those of 12 lead dynamic electrocardiogram and 64 slice spiral CT(P<0.05). ConclusionsBoth 12 leads ambulatory electrocardiogram and 64 slice spiral CT have applied value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, combined the two can significantly enhance the sensitivity and specificity, and decrease the rate of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.