当前位置:首页 / 碳酸锂联合齐拉西酮治疗双相情感障碍抑郁发作患者疗效观察
论著 | 更新时间:2021-10-29
|
碳酸锂联合齐拉西酮治疗双相情感障碍抑郁发作患者疗效观察
Efficacy observation on lithium carbonate combined with ziprasidone in the treatment of patients with bipolar affective disorder in depressive episode

内科 202116卷05期 页码:619-621+658

作者机构:南宁市第五人民医院精神科,广西南宁市530001

基金信息:*通信作者:石广念,南宁市第五人民医院精神科,电子邮箱sgn1963@163.com

DOI:DOI:10.16121/j.cnki.cn45-1347/r.2021.05.15

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献
目的探讨碳酸锂联合齐拉西酮治疗双相情感障碍抑郁发作患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法选取于2019年4月至2020年5月在我院住院治疗的双相情感障碍抑郁发作患者66例,采用随机数字法分为研究组和对照组,每组33例。研究组患者给予碳酸锂联合齐拉西酮治疗,对照组患者给予碳酸锂联合喹硫平治疗,疗程6周。比较两组患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、Beck-Rafaelsen躁狂量表(BRMS)评分;比较两组患者的临床疗效;比较两组患者的药物副作用量表(TESS)评分及不良反应发生情况。结果治疗前,两组患者的HAMD、HAMA、BRMS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗第6周末,两组患者的HAMD、HAMA、BRMS评分均显著降低(P<0.05),但两组患者各量表评分以及治疗总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组患者的TESS评分以及不良反应发生率均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论碳酸锂联合齐拉西酮治疗双相情感障碍抑郁发作患者的临床效果与碳酸锂联合喹硫平治疗的效果相当,但不良反应更轻、治疗安全性更高,患者可长期进行维持治疗。
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy and safety of lithium carbonate combined with ziprasidone in the treatment of patients with bipolar affective disorder in depressive episode. MethodsA total of 66 patients with bipolar affective disorder in depressive episode who were hospitalized in our hospital from April 2019 to May 2020 were selected and randomly divided into study group and control group by the random number method, with 33 cases in each group. Patients in the study group were administrated lithium carbonate combined with ziprasidone, while the patients in the control group were treated with lithium carbonate combined with quetiapine, for a 6-week treatment course. The scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale (BRMS) were compared between the two groups. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. The Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) scores and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. ResultsBefore treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the scores of HAMD, HAMA and BRMS between the two groups (P>0.05). At the end of the 6th week of treatment, the scores as above significantly decreased in both groups (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of each scale and the total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The TESS score and the incidence of adverse reactions in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). ConclusionThe thearpeutic effect of lithium carbonate combined with ziprasidone in the treatment of patients with bipolar affective disorder in depressive episode is comparable to that of lithium carbonate combined with quetiapine; however, the former has fewer adverse reactions and is preferable safety.

1869

浏览量

939

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集