当前位置:首页 / 布美他尼、呋塞米治疗对急性左心衰竭患者心功能及血清HMGB1、sST2水平的影响▲
论著 | 更新时间:2022-04-01
|
布美他尼、呋塞米治疗对急性左心衰竭患者心功能及血清HMGB1、sST2水平的影响▲
Effects of bumetanide and furosemide on cardiac function, serum HMGB1 and sST2 levels in patients with acute left ventricular failure

内科 202217卷01期 页码:40-43

作者机构:宜阳县人民医院急诊科,河南省宜阳县471600

基金信息:▲基金项目:河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(LHGJ20190793)

DOI:DOI:10.16121/j.cnki.cn45-1347/r.2022.01.11

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献
目的观察布美他尼、呋塞米治疗对急性左心衰竭患者心功能及血清高迁移率组蛋白Box1(HMGB1)、可溶性生长刺激基因表达蛋白2(sST2)水平的影响。方法选取2019年1月至2021年1月我院收治的急性左心衰竭患者98例,采用随机数字法分为布美他尼组和呋塞米组,每组49例。两组患者均予以强心、扩血管等常规抗心衰治疗。在此基础上,呋塞米组患者给予呋塞米治疗,布美他尼组患者给予布美他尼治疗,疗程7 d。比较两组患者的临床治疗效果;比较两组患者治疗前后的心功能及血清HMGB1、sST2水平;比较两组患者治疗期间的每日平均尿量及不良反应发生情况。结果治疗7 d,布美他尼组患者的治疗总有效率(95.92%)显著高于呋塞米组(83.67%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者的每搏输出量(SV)、左室射血分数(LVEF)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗7 d后,两组患者的SV、LVEF均显著升高,布美他尼组的水平显著高于呋塞米组;治疗期间,布美他尼组患者的日平均尿量明显大于呋塞米组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者的HMGB1、sST2水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗7 d后,两组患者的HMGB1、sST2水平均显著降低,但两组患者的HMGB1、sST2水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗期间两组患者的不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论布美他尼和呋塞米均可减轻急性左心衰竭患者的心脏负荷,减轻心肌损伤,但布美他尼的利尿作用及改善心功能作用更为显著,临床治疗效果更好。
ObjectiveTo observe the effects of bumetanide and furosemide on cardiac function, serum high mobility group Box 1 (HMGB1) and soluble growth stimulation gene expressed protein 2 (sST2) levels in patients with acute left ventricular failure (ALVF). MethodsA total of 98 ALVF patients admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2021 were selected and randomly divided into bumetanide group and furosemide group, with 49 cases in each group. Both groups were given routine anti-heart failure treatment, such as cardiotonic therapy, vascular dilation, etc. On this basis, furosemide group was treated with furosemide, while bumetanide group was treated with bumetanide, for a 7-day treatment course. The clinical therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. The cardiac function, levels of serum HMGB1 and sST2 were compared between the two groups before and after the treatment. The average daily urine output and the occurrence of adverse reactions during treatment were compared between the two groups. ResultsAfter 7 days of treatment, the total effective rate in the bumetanide group (95.92%) was significantly higher than that in the furosemide group (83.67%), with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in stroke volume (SV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between the two groups (P>0.05). After 7 days of treatment, SV and LVEF in both groups increased significantly, SV and LVEF in bumetanide group were significantly higher than those in the furosemide group. During treatment, the average daily urine output of patients in bumetanide group was significantly greater than that in the furosemide group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the levels of HMGB1 and sST2 between the two groups (P>0.05). After 7 days of treatment, the levels of HMGB1 and sST2 in both groups decreased significantly, but the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of adverse reactions between the two groups during treatment (P>0.05). ConclusionBoth bumetanide and furosemide can relieve cardiac load and reduce myocardial injury in patients with acute left ventricular failure. However, bumetanide has more significant diuretic effect and improvement of cardiac function, with better clinical treatment effect.

1902

浏览量

516

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集