当前位置:首页 / 半量HAG/CAG/IAG方案联合阿扎胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病患者临床效果观察▲
论著 | 更新时间:2022-05-18
|
半量HAG/CAG/IAG方案联合阿扎胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病患者临床效果观察▲
Half dose HAG / CAG / IAG regimen combined with azacitidine in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia patients: an observation of clinical effect

内科 202217卷02期 页码:130-133

作者机构:商丘市第一人民医院血液内科,河南省商丘市476100

基金信息:▲基金项目:国家卫生健康委十三五规划全国重点课题(YYWS1852)

DOI:DOI:10.16121/j.cnki.cn45-1347/r.2022.02.02

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献
目的探讨半量HAG/CAG/IAG方案联合阿扎胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的临床效果。方法选取2019年12月至2020年12月我院收治的AML患者150例为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组各75例。对照组患者采用标准剂量HAG/CAG/IAG方案治疗,观察组患者采用半量HAG/CAG/IAG方案联合阿扎胞苷治疗,连续治疗2个疗程。比较两组患者的临床疗效;检测比较两组患者治疗前后的免疫功能及外周血细胞水平;比较两组患者治疗期间的非血液不良事件发生情况;比较两组患者治疗结束后1年的生存率。结果治疗2个疗程,观察组患者的治疗总有效率(92.0%)显著高于对照组(80.0%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者的中性粒细胞计数、血红蛋白(Hb)、血小板计数(PLT)水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗2个疗程后,两组患者的中性粒细胞计数、Hb以及PLT水平均显著升高,观察组患者的水平显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者的CD3+、CD4+和CD4+/CD8+水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗2个疗程后,两组患者的CD3+、CD4+和CD4+/CD8+水平均显著降低,但观察组患者的水平显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗期间,观察组患者的非血液不良事件发生率(6.67%)显著低于对照组(17.33%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗结束后观察组患者的1年存活率(92.0%)高于对照组(85.3%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论半量HAG/CAG/IAG方案联合阿扎胞苷治疗急性髓系白血病患者的疗效明显,可显著改善患者造血功能,对患者免疫功能的损伤较小,治疗安全性较高。
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of half dose HAG/CAG/IAG regimen combined with azacitidine on patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MethodsA total of 150 patients with AML admitted to our hospital from December 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the research objects, and they were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 75 cases in each group. The control group was treated with standard dose HAG/CAG/IAG regimen, while the observation group was treated with half dose HAG/CAG/IAG regimen combined with azacitidine, for 2 courses of continuous treatment. The clinical efficacy was compared between two groups. The immune function and peripheral blood cell levels of the two groups were detected and compared before and after treatment. The occurrence of non-hematologic adverse events during treatment and the 1-year survival rate after treatment were compared between the two groups. ResultsWith 2 courses of treatment, the total effective rate of treatment of the observation group (92.0%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (80.0%), with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the levels of neutrophil count, hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet count (PLT) between the two groups (P>0.05). After 2 courses of treatment, the levels of neutrophil count, Hb and PLT in the two groups increased significantly, which were higher in the observation group than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the levels of CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+ /CD8+ between the two groups (P>0.05). After 2 courses of treatment, the levels of CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in both groups decreased significantly, which were higher in the observation group than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). During treatment, the occurrence of non-hematologic adverse events in the observation group (6.67%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (17.33%), with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). After treatment, the 1-year survival rate of the observation group (92.0%) was higher than that of the control group (85.3%), while the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). ConclusionHalf dose HAG/CAG/IAG regimen combined with azacitidine is obviously effective in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia, which can significantly improve the hematopoietic function of patients, with less damage to the immune function of patients and high therapeutic safety.

1976

浏览量

657

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集